Doug, thanks for the suggestion. In fact I went back to this place yesterday to take some more pictures, but the weather wasn't as nice. I also passed the place where I took the third picture and I think it might not be possible to back up enough to take a vertical picture. But I'll try it nevertheless next time I'll go there.
Thanks, people! You're probably right and the third picture doesn't quite fit in this set. I think it's also an ok photo, but the other two are too different.
I'll try to take more pictures in this area. I was lucky to find the place and lucky to have nice light and clouds. Also I happened to be there on a Saturday, no people around.
this is good - usually i am not attracted by such pictures, but this is interesting.
The third one is not as clean as the first two but for me it has its quality. The stones as a piece of nature in the aseptic area are ridiculous.
### S(3) <>
Arthur Fleischmann
S(3) <>
Arthur Fleischmann
### S(3) <>
Arthur Fleischmann
### S(3) <>
Arthur Fleischmann
them stones, like whaat ;), my favourite definitely.
### S(3) <>
Arthur Fleischmann
I'll try to take more pictures in this area. I was lucky to find the place and lucky to have nice light and clouds. Also I happened to be there on a Saturday, no people around.
### S(3) <>
Arthur Fleischmann
3 is out of ...concept?
### S(3) <>
Arthur Fleischmann
The third one is not as clean as the first two but for me it has its quality. The stones as a piece of nature in the aseptic area are ridiculous.
### S(3) <>
Arthur Fleischmann
### S(3) <>
Arthur Fleischmann
### S(3) <>
Arthur Fleischmann
### S(3) <>
Arthur Fleischmann
S(2) <>
Arthur Fleischmann
S(2) <>
Arthur Fleischmann
### S(3) <>
Arthur Fleischmann
### S(3) <>
Arthur Fleischmann
### S(3) <>
Arthur Fleischmann
S(2) <>
Arthur Fleischmann
S(2) <>
Arthur Fleischmann
S(3) <>
Arthur Fleischmann
### S(3) <>
Arthur Fleischmann