Definitively nr. 1, I can imagine it as a laaarge print. The cloud is in the perfect position, the composition itself is perfect. The second uses red to attract the attention, but too much red object speaking together for me. Third - discard :)
About processing: I honestly don't know how to avoid that line aliasing problem, maybe I'm doing something wrong when sharpening the picture? Anyhow, this is only visible in the web-sized version. The second one I might try to process again, there could be more shadow detail but I wanted that narrow strip of light and the sky to be very much in contrast to what's in the shadow.
Regarding the connection of the two pictures, I agree with Doug that there is no "substantial" one. I think there are similarities in composition and elements which can be found in both pictures, other than that, it's up to everyone to find his own connections... or not. ;-)
i dont think it would be like arthur to have the question put like that (which one is the better) ;)
on the other hand, i'd be hard put to find a substantial connection between these two. i mean, apart from those heavy-weight spiritual associations everybody creates exclusively for himself. or not? perhaps we'll find out here ;)
(i'd just like to see more care in processing... in particular RE line aliasing on the 1st image and shadow detail on the 2nd. i love it when this kind of stuff gets nursed to perfection.)
### S(3) <>
Arthur Fleischmann
### S(3) <>
Arthur Fleischmann
### S(3) <>
Arthur Fleischmann
it's going to be perfect.
### S(3) <>
Arthur Fleischmann
I like the second one much.
### S(3) <>
Arthur Fleischmann
i'll keep comin back i guess.
S(2) <>
Arthur Fleischmann
S(3) <>
Arthur Fleischmann
S(2) <>
Arthur Fleischmann
S(3) <>
Arthur Fleischmann
S(3) <>
Arthur Fleischmann
S(3) <>
Arthur Fleischmann
S(2) <>
Arthur Fleischmann
About processing: I honestly don't know how to avoid that line aliasing problem, maybe I'm doing something wrong when sharpening the picture? Anyhow, this is only visible in the web-sized version. The second one I might try to process again, there could be more shadow detail but I wanted that narrow strip of light and the sky to be very much in contrast to what's in the shadow.
Regarding the connection of the two pictures, I agree with Doug that there is no "substantial" one. I think there are similarities in composition and elements which can be found in both pictures, other than that, it's up to everyone to find his own connections... or not. ;-)
S(2) <>
Arthur Fleischmann
S(2) <>
Arthur Fleischmann
how complicate :-)
S(2) <>
Arthur Fleischmann
second I am missing light
S(2) <>
Arthur Fleischmann
S(2) <>
Arthur Fleischmann
on the other hand, i'd be hard put to find a substantial connection between these two. i mean, apart from those heavy-weight spiritual associations everybody creates exclusively for himself. or not? perhaps we'll find out here ;)
S(2) <>
Arthur Fleischmann
(i'd just like to see more care in processing... in particular RE line aliasing on the 1st image and shadow detail on the 2nd. i love it when this kind of stuff gets nursed to perfection.)
S(3) <>
Arthur Fleischmann
S(3) <>
Arthur Fleischmann