Filter in effect:

(anyone) 
[fs:261]
Arthur Fleischmann [fs:261]



not for me... i still don't get why this picture got into g0 nor what's so good about it... but it just doesn't feel that way for me.



well, i can understand the composition. :)
when i go to the stone gallery, for exaple, i never think like: i would cut it from left and moved the camera up. but its ok to say it.



same as for Michal - it looks very Czech to me too.
i like these "by the way type shots".



i don't quite get this one... right now... but i'll come back ti check it once again.



Mr. TeePee wrote: "these objects are very cool and very surrealistic,
but medial and aside imbalanced composition is not good for me."

Yes,
I do not understand the composition, absolutely ...



Tomas Pavlik, thanks... you're saying I should have pointed the camera further down? I have been thinking quite a bit about the composition in this one, I'm also not completely sure if I could have done it better.



try to dip a glass slightly more down? :)
but it is my personal problem with this picture maybe.



these objects are very cool and very surrealistic,
but medial and aside imbalanced composition is not good for me.

I'm looking forward to next one.
ps - forgive me for my czenglish Arthur. :)



how fitting from somebody who can't even tell an author doesn't speak czech.

ses uz docela trapna, lucie.



It really is heaps of things. Makes me smile everytime I come back, this is one funny still-life.



prcak = whatever
zadnej prekladatelskej vorisek to nejni, jesito jesito ;)



Thank you,

Juan Pablo, what's "prcak"?
Michal, interesting... it was taken in Austria. But it's not that far away.



i can watch it for long time and still enjoy it, whats not happening often to me. great moment.)


fstop-3.6.10.1/eloise-2.4.15.8
Comments, page 9/11

Page