[<>]
[close verbose info panel]                 Title: <> [alum]

 

[fs:261]
Author: Arthur Fleischmann
Portfolio: (not in any portfolio)

Publicity level:

Set visible to non-members
Commenting: Set commenting allowed
Highlight:
Yes
 

Published on, medium:
2007-12-21 21:25, film: medium format

Tech. data:
Portra 400NC

Remarks:
<>

Nr. of views, unique comments/unique views:
3775, 23/99 (23 % have commented)

Social bookmarking:
 facebook     digg     delicious     reddit     stumbleupon     myspace


[fs:311]

TS ma recht.
to je supr, ze se tu nekde neco takhle vynori!


[fs:233]

this one is really good. (just came back and realized i didnt leave comment before.)


[fs:134]

"g0 thumbnail is much better... 4me" too.

white paspart off.

this scene is cool, i think the snapshot was done well.


[fs:212]

im not quite sure if i got it... composed like an abstract painting... and that is the way im trying to think about this picture, cause if i look at it as a photo i dont like it that much...


[fs:104]

"good" is a quality of dubious substance. ;)


[fs:245]

not for me... i still don't get why this picture got into g0 nor what's so good about it... but it just doesn't feel that way for me.


[fs:240]

well, i can understand the composition. :)
when i go to the stone gallery, for exaple, i never think like: i would cut it from left and moved the camera up. but its ok to say it.


[fs:172]

same as for Michal - it looks very Czech to me too.
i like these "by the way type shots".


[fs:245]

i don't quite get this one... right now... but i'll come back ti check it once again.


[fs:120]

g0 thumbnail is much better... 4me.


[fs:120]

Mr. TeePee wrote: "these objects are very cool and very surrealistic,
but medial and aside imbalanced composition is not good for me."

Yes,
I do not understand the composition, absolutely ...


[fs:261]

Tomas Pavlik, thanks... you're saying I should have pointed the camera further down? I have been thinking quite a bit about the composition in this one, I'm also not completely sure if I could have done it better.


[fs:127]

try to dip a glass slightly more down? :)
but it is my personal problem with this picture maybe.


[fs:127]

these objects are very cool and very surrealistic,
but medial and aside imbalanced composition is not good for me.

I'm looking forward to next one.
ps - forgive me for my czenglish Arthur. :)


[fs:1]

how fitting from somebody who can't even tell an author doesn't speak czech.

ses uz docela trapna, lucie.


[fs:2]

It really is heaps of things. Makes me smile everytime I come back, this is one funny still-life.


[fs:175]

prcak = whatever
zadnej prekladatelskej vorisek to nejni, jesito jesito ;)


[fs:194]

hard to express....
love it.


[fs:261]

Thank you,

Juan Pablo, what's "prcak"?
Michal, interesting... it was taken in Austria. But it's not that far away.


[fs:240]

i can watch it for long time and still enjoy it, whats not happening often to me. great moment.)


fstop-3.6.10.1/eloise-2.4.15.8
Arthur Fleischmann - <>