i think the better part still is the building, arthur ;)
but way to go.

(and while we're at drawing far-fetched comparisons ;), the Pospech series reminds me of Kollar's Nothing Special, only it dont have the moments ;)

yeah, i didnt find any link either. apart from the striped supermarket wall. that one series is much about people and their global-ised world (quite an aggravating concept already --imo).

neat futura. soothing & blue.

a picture where the first, second, even fifth impression is low or nil and cannot be boosted without (often painstaking) philosophical input from my side ;).

i can marvel at the cleanliness but gotta admit i'm somewhat losing on the overall impress...ivity (?). it's still there, but tis already too much of a pundit picture for me, i enjoy other stuff of yours, with all its sheer visual power and unambiguous interpretations.

guess, comes time when you start portraying things other than tractors and hosepipes using this technique... i'm definitely hooked up to see more ;)

looks soo unreal. (historic digression: some years ago, this was what botched-up "photorealistic" 3D scenes looked like.)
thing is, i aint sure if that's really the thing to make it look appealing to me. perhaps the most appealing thing then, is the question itself. ;)

[mrar], i'd love to have a rollie there ;)

izzat like in the diagonals?
</helpless>
:)

well i think the third just like rocks the place.
them stones, like whaat ;), my favourite definitely.

never mind sex pistols.

i just been gawpin at this on and on. it's so fucken clean, i'll never be able to do anything nearly so pristine oh mother!!11!

pure.
i'll keep comin back i guess.

i dont think it would be like arthur to have the question put like that (which one is the better) ;)
on the other hand, i'd be hard put to find a substantial connection between these two. i mean, apart from those heavy-weight spiritual associations everybody creates exclusively for himself. or not? perhaps we'll find out here ;)

got both the same carpet and parquetry.
could use the couch though... leather? ;)

the view reminds me of Ana's (Trninic) shots. which is positive :).

"good" is a quality of dubious substance. ;)

it's heaps of tings..

there's something very peculiar about this type of pictures. cant say it's downright special or even rare, but i don't get to see such pictures every day... i know people though, who tried and failed at this.
now this here, it somehow feels right. it's dead and blunt, yet kicking and subtle. there's much power pumped into the visuals but it's obvious you're also trying to capture stuff beneath (or beyond, around? ;) the flashed surface. when you fully succeed at this, there will be things to behold. (hear ye the prophet, mortalzz ;))

this is gonna be fun to watch, contemplate.