<all comments> ]


tak tusim zacnem obdivovat fashion.
vlastne tuto uz dost obdivujem.. tie kvietky by som nemusel, hladam stale kde maju tien. ;) chapem modni redaktor, to znie desivo.
popravde to vidim tak ze vyraz modelky v tom super svetle to utiahne a este ma sem pritiahne.



mě na tom irituje, jak jsou pořešený ty ruce... zaostřený, jakoby naleštěný, vůbec celkově nepřirozený. zbytek fotky je úplně jinej, zvlášť ten výraz je skvělej! hmm.



dobre. hlavne dvojka ma bere. a este tak mat prachy za ten tvoj fotak a objektiv. to by boli vianoce. zdar.



mne se to takhle na prvni pohled taky docela hodne libi, ale nejak mam pocit, ze to je ten typ zaberu, kdy clovek za tyden zjisti, ze to cely funguje (nebo nefunguje) uplne jinak. tak budu sledovat a dam vedet. :)



to mi zni dost strizlive, budu se tesit.



arthur, to me this is some very solid work, including those thoughts you've tried to put into words down here.

that said, i too have had other favorites in your ball-saal folio (all deleted now).

i tend to skip number one (iber). it's horrible :) but i kinda expected to see it having skimmed through what you currently have up on your personal site. it might very well be the most important one in the whole set, because it makes me think about how far you can stretch abstraction without violating visuals, as visuals, to me, always come before anything else when doing this kind of "seek & twist" on reality. so, though i have to admit i maybe even hate this particular frame, it's also true it serves as the most thought-provoking, at least in this actual setting.

the second one, koca, lacks consistency in terms of composition in the series, and personally i find the composition unfortunate if not arbitrary. other than that the photo is fine to me.

the rest, excluding etau (etau seems to me to be about something completely different than the rest of the set, and i don't like it), just flat out _works_ - and very much to my personal preferences. cheers!

btw, exai reminded me of an old amiga game, moonstone. don't ask why, i have no idea. :)



(a ta prvni dolce vita s vlkama byla prvni vetsi fashion co jsem kdy fotil, todle je naopak uplne nejcerstvejsi prace, tyden stara...)



ono to casem samo prichazi... u foceni fashion je spousta veci ktery musej fungovat ve stejnou dobu - saty musej bejt videt, musi bejt videt strih a silueta, slecna musi bejt krasna, svetlo musi bejt ok, musi to bejt technicky 100%, cely foceni mas za zadama modniho redaktora kterej ti do toho keda... takze pak az kdyz vsechno z tohodle funguje tak mam prostor na to abych resil neco dalsiho, dostal do toho trochu ty nenahodny nahody... kouzlo... a dusi... jde to pomalu... ale snad to jde... uvidime za rok dva tri... :)



o mnoho prijemnejsie nez predchadzajuce. hlavne tie figuriny som nemusel, ale toto je super.



i got the idea you wanted to say at first sight - it means i like it. :) but i dont understand the first one in that line.
your sentence below about why are you shooting those things is the one im trying to think up for year...



zvysok som presvihol. kua. rano bola arogantna? asi sa dobre nevyspala. hlavne ze vecer bola fajn.



wow, the folks start to sort pictures like this one yes and this one no.

so, for me it's important to feel whole series as is. the conection bettween first and the others pieces is still a little hiden for me, but on other hand, it's more interesting for me becouse of this.
i'm totally agree that it's foolish to iluminate what message is in this set.
for me, it's something like when i'm coming home from pub early morning and the world around is "deformed" by night. the well-known places are incognoscible... and it's my feeling from this series.


fstop-3.6.10.1/eloise-2.4.15.9
Comments, page 2277/4284

Page
2277