<all comments> ]


arthur, i don't see any problem with keeping things simple. :)



tady mistr je sice deset metrů od děje, ale působivosti to vůbec neubírá. ty linkovaný nedrží partu, tyhle jo.



it must be taken by a very smart camera.

but the only thing i hear in my head is last christmas... ;-)

i like exai, hello.



hm, to ma neco. Ta mirna zamlzenost je zajimava. Mozna bych ji zkusmo u oci trosku ubral, aby si toho neceho vsimlo vice lidi. :-)



fajn - na prvni pohled z toho mam preapokalypticky dojem (tam vzadu uz musi jet tsunami) krasne kontrastujici s hrajicimi si detmi.



ja nevim, mne tam neco nesedi. se na to divam, a napul je to jako "dobova fotka", napul tam citim nejakou fales, ale neurcim jakou .)



to je nechutne, jak se ti podarilo sjednotit tak nesourode formy.



there's something very peculiar about this type of pictures. cant say it's downright special or even rare, but i don't get to see such pictures every day... i know people though, who tried and failed at this.
now this here, it somehow feels right. it's dead and blunt, yet kicking and subtle. there's much power pumped into the visuals but it's obvious you're also trying to capture stuff beneath (or beyond, around? ;) the flashed surface. when you fully succeed at this, there will be things to behold. (hear ye the prophet, mortalzz ;))


fstop-3.6.10.1/eloise-2.4.15.9
Comments, page 2275/4284

Page
2275