<all comments> ]


of course that is in the end of way, but the dark side is too much dark :-)

how complicate :-)



first is great
second I am missing light



ja myslim, ze kompozice je naprosto andelska... i ten naznak stromu vpravo je super, ale je to na mne prilis ponure, kdyz uz je to takto..... proc???



yeah, never mind the "means" of the connection... as long as there is one.



radku, to by byla krasna etericka ptakovina pro me, ale muselo by to byt v poradku kompozicne... takhle na to naopak nemuzu koukat.

(a btw ty rozblurovany hrany, ts ts ts.)



tesim teda na dalsi zavislaky...



pekne vysikmeny, ale rvu se s tou jednoduchosti... neni sprcha malo?



i dont think it would be like arthur to have the question put like that (which one is the better) ;)
on the other hand, i'd be hard put to find a substantial connection between these two. i mean, apart from those heavy-weight spiritual associations everybody creates exclusively for himself. or not? perhaps we'll find out here ;)



to me these are very good scenes, both!

(i'd just like to see more care in processing... in particular RE line aliasing on the 1st image and shadow detail on the 2nd. i love it when this kind of stuff gets nursed to perfection.)



omalovanky pjekny. mozna v nejakem sirsim souboru...



vecny tema lamp... rozjedeme neco jako s karavanama? he?



ty pohledy ven, ta sikmina... nevim proste, o co tam jde... :/



Aha, ok... I thought I might be missing something. Would you like to say something about your ideas behind this series? But if you don't, no problem... ;-)



Hmmm... This is a bit too simple for me, if you know what I mean. Neat and dirty on the outside, trash and chaos around the corner. Yeah, ok... but that alone is not enough to make this sequence interesting for me. The first two are nice, though.


fstop-3.6.10.1/eloise-2.4.15.9
Comments, page 1792/4284

Page
1792