napr. podle tohoto by to jednoznace byl eos digi (a podle jejich knizky asi take ;)):
"Whether or not Leica toting Magnum photographers buy the M8 will not ensure the success/failure of this camera. Leica is not targeting the professional market, that is not where the money is. Some professionals will buy, some won't. But there are far more serious amateur and hobbyist users out there who love Leica and rangefinders, and it is THOSE people they are going after.
It is possible that Leica may use Magnum photographers for promotional purposes for their camera. Canon has done that with the agency VII...."
nerekl bych, ze to vypada jako 1d/1ds - ohnisko odhaduju na neco kolem 40mm kinoekv., na nekterejch zaberech zaostreno cca. na 5m dopredu -> mira maznuti pozadi na tak malym senzoru nedosazitelna. i kdyz samozrejme ve photoshopu se da uplacat leccos - vubec bych se nedivil, kdyby to digi fakt bylo.
ja bych to hadal na nejakej eos 1d mark ii, trochu lepsi lkovy skla (soude podle bokehu) a citlivej processing... co tyhle fotaky davaj s dobryma sklama za masakr je impressive. a vypada to presne takhle ciste a mekkounce.
"Whether or not Leica toting Magnum photographers buy the M8 will not ensure the success/failure of this camera. Leica is not targeting the professional market, that is not where the money is. Some professionals will buy, some won't. But there are far more serious amateur and hobbyist users out there who love Leica and rangefinders, and it is THOSE people they are going after.
It is possible that Leica may use Magnum photographers for promotional purposes for their camera. Canon has done that with the agency VII...."